+1, saved me some typing............ I knew 'jack' once upon a time and still don't prefer tubes except in certain apps and even then not enough to return to that particular aggravation. There is a certain 'synergy' with compression horns and 'full-range' drivers though, so bi-amping is the best of both 'worlds' IME.
Anyway, for any basic point source+horn system, CD horn EQ [LCR network] to level match [tonally balance] the horn to the woofer is required, which in turn unfortunately shelves down the HF, which wasn't a problem when these systems were conceived since there were no recordings with any to speak of and the amp's high output impedance had a built in 'smiley face' EQ to boost the low/high ends, then later they just added bass, treble controls via variable damping [DF] to 'boost' it further.
Most of us nowadays don't have the proper tube electronics to do it up right, complete with the 'flabby'/loose bass as the trade-off, but we can easily do similar by adjusting the horn/woofer's tonal balance with the horn's attenuator and once this is dialed in we can 'lift up' the HF to blend in by adding a by-pass cap around it, i.e. essentially do what the M19's fancy XO allows.
IIRC 0.1-1 uF was the most used range way back when, but let your ears rule since we as a species have incredibly poor HF hearing once we get a little age on us and room acoustics, signal chains varies greatly. Zobels are only really needed for when there's a high output impedance source or have a complex passive XO and even then only if you're wanting a very flat frequency response like is required in a studio monitor type app.
Note women and especially children are [much] more sensitive to upper mids/HF, so they're the ones I used to find the best trade-off woofer/horn balance and cap value. Of course if it's a 'man cave' app.........
GM
Bookmarks